India's top court upholds national identity project but curbs use
NEW DELHI (Reuters) - The Supreme Court on Wednesday upheld the validity of India’s ambitious biometric identity project, ‘Aadhaar’, saying it benefited the marginalized and poor, but sharply reined in a government push to make it mandatory for various services.
FILE PHOTO: A woman goes through the process of eye scanning for Unique Identification (UID) database system in the outskirts of the western Indian city of Ahmedabad February 13, 2013. REUTERS/Amit Dave/File Photo
In a ruling with far-reaching consequences, a panel of five judges cleared the use of Aadhaar for welfare schemes, saying it empowered the poor and marginalized.
A majority of the panel ruled the program had merits, but struck down a government effort to make its use mandatory in applications for services ranging from bank accounts to mobile telephone connections and school admissions.
“I think this is a fabulous judgment,” said lawyer Kapil Sibal, a member of the opposition Congress party, who had argued in court against the sweeping use of Aadhaar as a means of identification.
“It takes care of citizens’ rights and it ensures we don’t have a surveillance state in place, it ensures that our privacy is not intruded into, and at the same time, it protects the rights of the marginalized,” Sibal told television channel CNN-IBN in an interview as the ruling was being delivered.
Among other objectives, the project aims for a unique Aadhaar number, tied to an individual’s iris scan and fingerprints, to help block theft and leakages in India’s $23.6-billion-a-year food welfare program.
The court also ruled unconstitutional the use of Aadhaar by companies to establish an individual’s identity.
Media have reported several cases of Aadhaar breaches, but Unique Identification Authority of India (UIDAI), which manages the program, and other supporters, argue the system is foolproof and secure.
“The reason why we challenged (it) was because it went beyond the public distribution system, beyond protecting the marginalized, and tried to create a surveillance state,” Sibal added.
Reporting by Suchitra Mohanty and Sudarshan Varadhan; Additional reporting by Zeba Siddiqui and Swati Bhat; Writing by Sankalp Phartiyal; Editing by Euan Rocha and Clarence Fernandez
Our Standards:The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.